Assessing the Impact of the Cures Act Final Rule: Patient Perceptions of Receiving Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening in the Patient Portal

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Do, Nguyen Huong
Lin, Joy
Parrott, Lindsey Claire

Issue Date

2025-05-01

Type

thesis_open

Language

Keywords

Cures Act , Final Rule , patient portal , prenatal screening , cfDNA , Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities Counseling Genetics and Genomics Health Communication Health Information Technology Health Policy Maternal and Child Health Medical Genetics Obstetrics and Gynecology

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Human Genetics Theses

Abstract

The 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule, implemented in April 2021, mandates the immediate release of electronic health records, including prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, through patient portals. This study examines the impact of this policy on prenatal patients’ experiences with accessing cfDNA results electronically before provider contact. A single survey was administered at Montefiore Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania Health System to retrospectively assess patient levels of anxiety, relief, and confusion at various stages of the testing process. Findings indicate a significant decrease in anxiety levels from baseline among participants who accessed their normal results through the patient portal before provider contact (p < 0.0001). Similarly, those who first viewed their results with a provider experienced reduced anxiety (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in anxiety reduction between the two groups (p = 0.49), nor was there a significant change in confusion (p = 0.28) or relief (p = 0.58) after speaking with a provider. Participants who accessed results through the portal first were significantly more likely to prefer receiving future results the same way compared to those who initially received results from a provider (p = 0.048). While many participants favored direct portal access, some expressed a preference for provider-mediated disclosure in the case of an abnormal result. A subset of participants reported difficulty interpreting their results due to technical language, and a few unintentionally discovered fetal sex through portal access, underscoring the need for customizable result release options. Future research should explore the experiences of patients receiving abnormal results and assess the broader impact of the Final Rule on genetic counseling practices.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

true

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN